Jaguar XF 2012 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 70 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 3 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 546 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`315 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |