Jaguar XF 2008 vs Volvo S80 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 416 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 101 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 12.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.9 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 11 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 480 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`270 kg | 2`320 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`842 kg | 1`742 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 428 kg | 578 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Volvo S80. Therefore, Volvo S80 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |