Jaguar XF 2008 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 57 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Chrysler 300C. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 300C engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 6 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 17 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.48 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.52 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`360 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |