Jaguar XF 2008 vs BMW 5 series 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 91 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 220 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 5 sērija 2010 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 19 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 520 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 20 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.48 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.42 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 5 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 5 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |