Jaguar XF 2008 vs Volkswagen Phaeton 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 35 HP more power than Volkswagen Phaeton, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volkswagen Phaeton. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Phaeton, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Phaeton. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Phaeton, 15 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.48 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.52 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Phaeton, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volkswagen Phaeton has
| |