Jaguar XF 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 104 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 367 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2014: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar XF engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.05 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 32 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 23 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 497 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 3 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.48 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.28 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |