Jaguar XF 2008 vs Jaguar XJ 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 293 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 37 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 307 NM less than Jaguar XJ. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 510'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar X-Type, Jaguar S-Type | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XJ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar XJ engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is smaller, but slightly higher. Jaguar XF is 29 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 520 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 20 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`215 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |