Jaguar XF 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jaguar XF) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo XC60) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 260 NM more than Volvo XC60. Despite less power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 31 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 70 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |