Jaguar XF 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 77 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 31 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 70 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`395 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
| |