Jaguar XF 2017 vs Renault Laguna 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1430 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1600 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Laguna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 15 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 508 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 57 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`107 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |