Jaguar XF 2017 vs Audi A6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF and Audi A6 have the same engine power, but Jaguar XF torque is 10 NM more than Audi A6. Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
| Jaguar XF consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1460 km on highway | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Audi A6, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 565 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`678 kg | 1`710 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 582 kg | 620 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |