Jaguar XF 2017 vs Seat Exeo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 43 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.0 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 29 cm longer than the Seat Exeo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 442 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |