Jaguar XF 2017 vs Ford Focus 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 100 HP more power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 163 NM more than Ford Focus. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Focus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Focus) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Focus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XE, Jaguar E-Pace | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar XF engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 40 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 476 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1502 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 89 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 1`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Focus has
| |