Jaguar XF 2017 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volvo V90. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Volvo V90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1526 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
| |