Jaguar XF 2017 vs Seat Exeo 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 50 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.7 | |
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 29 cm longer than the Seat Exeo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 442 litres | |
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 14 800 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |