Jaguar XF 2012 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 73 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 5 sērija 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 10 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |