Jaguar XF 2012 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 56 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 120 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 10 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`385 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |