Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes E class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 9 HP more power than Mercedes E class, but torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes E klase 2013 3.0 engine: The Mercedes-Benz OM642 is a 3.0-liter V6 diesel widely used in many models under the 3.0 CDI or 350 CDI designation. It is known for strong performance and good durability when maintained properly, and well-kept engines are capable of exceeding 500,000 km. At the same time, the unit has several characteristic weak ... More about Mercedes E klase 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 145 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |