Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes CLS 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 18 HP less power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Mercedes CLS. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLS engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes CLS 2014 3.0 engine: The Mercedes-Benz OM642 is a 3.0-liter V6 diesel widely used in many models under the 3.0 CDI or 350 CDI designation. It is known for strong performance and good durability when maintained properly, and well-kept engines are capable of exceeding 500,000 km. At the same time, the unit has several characteristic weak ... More about Mercedes CLS 2014 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XF is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 476 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |