Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes CLS 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 70 HP more power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes CLS. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1430 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes CLS 2014 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XF is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 476 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |