Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes CLS 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 25 HP less power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Mercedes CLS. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XF is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 590 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |