Jaguar XF 2012 vs Volvo XC70 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF and Volvo XC70 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |