Jaguar XF 2012 vs Citroen C5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 41 HP less power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Citroen C5. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Used also on Peugeot 508 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 14 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 45 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`367 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |