Jaguar XF 2012 vs Volvo V90 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 13 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo V90. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 3 cm longer than the Volvo V90, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1526 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |