Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes CLS 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 41 HP less power than Mercedes CLS, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes CLS. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1620 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine Mercedes CLS 2014 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes CLS, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XF is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 590 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |