Jaguar XF 2020 vs Skoda Superb 2023
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Superb can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XF also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Skoda Superb is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 300 HP | 150 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 430 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 8 seconds | 5.7 - 9.3 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar XF are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Superb. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 9.7 | 0.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 745 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1724 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Superb may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`256 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |