Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XF also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar XF are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC60. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.6 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
885 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`321 kg | ~ 2`499 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`723 kg | ~ 1`814 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 598 kg | ~ 685 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |