Jaguar XF 2015 vs Mazda 6 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 6 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 145 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 213 - 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar XF are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.6 | 4.4 - 9.0 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
885 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`321 kg | ~ 2`066 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`723 kg | ~ 1`509 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 598 kg | ~ 557 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |