Jaguar XF 2015 vs Ford Mondeo 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mondeo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mondeo can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XF also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 170 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | 7.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar XF are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Mondeo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.6 | 3.6 - 9.4 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Mondeo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 8 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 429 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
885 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 111 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`321 kg | ~ 2`224 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`723 kg | ~ 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 598 kg | ~ 679 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Ford Mondeo. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |