Jaguar XF 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 5 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 184 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 450 NM | 270 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | 4.7 - 8.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.6 | 4.5 - 11.0 | |
|
On average, the Jaguar XF petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 5 series. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 520 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 20 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`302 | ~ 2`305 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The BMW 5 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |