Jaguar XF 2011 vs BMW 5 series 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XF is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 5 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 550 HP | 184 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 680 NM | 270 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 8.5 seconds | 4.7 - 8.2 seconds | |
| In general, BMW 5 series are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jaguar XF. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 12.5 | 4.5 - 11.0 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 520 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 20 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`328 kg | ~ 2`305 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`779 kg | ~ 1`699 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 549 kg | ~ 606 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than BMW 5 series. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 5 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 5 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |