Jaguar XF 2008 vs Jaguar XJ 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 510 HP | 240 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 293 - 625 NM | 340 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 12.5 | 7.0 - 12.1 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 22 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 520 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 20 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.48 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 1.22 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`291 | ~ 2`346 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |