Jaguar XF 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XF also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 300 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.4 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 31 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 70 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`261 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
| |