Jaguar XF 2017 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mondeo can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 300 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 170 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.4 seconds | 8 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 9 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 488 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1585 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 77 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`261 | ~ 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |