Jaguar XF 2017 vs Seat Exeo 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Seat Exeo can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 300 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 230 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.4 seconds | 7.3 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 5.0 - 7.7 | |
|
Jaguar XF petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Exeo. On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 29 cm longer than the Seat Exeo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 442 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 123 litres more trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`261 | ~ 2`051 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |