Jaguar XF 2012 vs Audi A6 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XF is available with rear wheel drive, while Audi A6 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 (diesel) | 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 275 HP | 204 - 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 - 601 NM | 400 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 10.9 seconds | 5.6 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 6.2 | 6.1 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, Jaguar XF equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 3 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 565 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`396 | ~ 2`519 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |