Jaguar XE 2019 vs Seat Exeo 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 50 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.7 | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XE consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 833 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage space. Jaguar XE has 50 litres less trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`150 kg | 2`015 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`536 kg | 1`455 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 614 kg | 560 kg | |
| Jaguar XE load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Seat Exeo. Therefore, Jaguar XE is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |