Jaguar XE 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 64 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XE consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XE could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XE is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XE is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`914 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |