Jaguar XE 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 114 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.7 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XE consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XE could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Mazda 3 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XE is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XE is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1138 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Jaguar XE can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`160 kg | 1`959 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`558 kg | 1`394 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 602 kg | 565 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |