Jaguar XE 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 178 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 187 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XE consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XE could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XE consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XE is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XE is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 1`902 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |