Jaguar XE 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 4 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XE engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 4 series, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW 4 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XE consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XE could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XE consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XE is 3 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`230 kg | 2`175 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar XE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 33 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |