Jaguar XE 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XE consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar XE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XE consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar XE is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XE is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.66 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.24 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`235 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |