Jaguar XE 2014 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XE consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XE consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1430 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XE is smaller. Jaguar XE is 20 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XE is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1356 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.66 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.06 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`235 kg | 2`270 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XE scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XE scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |