Jaguar XE 2014 vs BMW 4 series 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 30 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 110 NM more than BMW 4 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Jaguar XE consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XE could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| BMW 4 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XE is 3 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
|
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 25 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.66 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.36 metres more than that of the BMW 4 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`235 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Jaguar XE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 38 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |