Jaguar XE 2014 vs BMW 3 series 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XE engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XE consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XE consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW 3 sērija 2015: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XE is 4 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 480 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 25 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.66 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.039999999999999 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`235 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |