Jaguar XE 2014 vs BMW 3 series 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XE engine produces 30 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 110 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XE consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XE consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XE is 4 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.66 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.26 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`235 kg | 2`085 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 3 series is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 27 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |