Jaguar XE 2019 vs Mazda 3 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XE is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XE is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XE also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 300 HP | 116 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 430 NM | 153 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 8.4 seconds | 8.1 - 12.1 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar XE are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.3 | 4.2 - 8.7 | |
|
Jaguar XE petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Jaguar XE equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | 135 - 140 mm (5.3 - 5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XE is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XE is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XE is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1138 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`192 kg | ~ 1`913 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`579 kg | ~ 1`402 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 613 kg | ~ 511 kg | |
| Jaguar XE load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Mazda 3. Therefore, Jaguar XE is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |