Jaguar XE 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XE is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XE also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 340 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 - 450 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 7.9 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.5 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Jaguar XE petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Jaguar XE equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jaguar XE is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XE is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XE has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Jaguar XE uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XE is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Jaguar XE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`176 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |