Jaguar XE 2014 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Jaguar XE is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Alfa Romeo Giulia can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.1 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 340 HP | 150 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 - 450 NM | 380 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 7.9 seconds | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.5 | 4.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Jaguar XE petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo Giulia. On average, Jaguar XE equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XE is 4 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XE is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`176 | ~ 1`444 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XE scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XE scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XE has
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
| |