Jaguar S-Type 1999 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 285 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar S-Type engine produces 74 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Jaguar S-Type reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 14.6 | |
|
The Jaguar S-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar S-Type consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jaguar S-Type over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar S-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar S-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.87 m | |
| Jaguar S-Type is 42 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar S-Type is 43 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar S-Type has 450 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Jaguar S-Type uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 1140 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar S-Type is 1.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jaguar S-Type can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar S-Type has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |